Bighorn sheep licking de-icer salt on Highway 16 in Jasper National Park

Report to Parks Canada and the Public on the Current State of


Jasper National Park



with Reference to Observations and Recommendations from 2002

Prepared for submission to Parks Canada, Jasper National Park                   

Prepared by Jasper Environmental Association

Box 2198, Jasper, Alberta  T0E 1E0  ·  780-852-4152  ·  jea2@telus.net

www.jasperenvironmental.org

January 29, 2007


Summary

The Jasper Environmental Association monitors Parks Canada’s efforts to manage the ecological health of Jasper National Park. This document follows up on our 2002 “report card” for the park.

As of 2006, we find that Parks Canada has made progress in protecting fish, removing motorized watercraft, getting commercial raft companies off the Maligne River, doing prescribed burns, closing some trails and areas to benefit grizzlies and elk, consolidating some of the agency’s facilities, operating campgrounds located in wildlife corridors more carefully, doing research on wildlife movement, prohibiting dogs in critical caribou habitat, prohibiting invasive forms of geo-caching, rehabilitating Pyramid Island and resolving trail-related problems at Cavell Meadows. We congratulate Parks Canada for these efforts.


We continue to find fault with Parks Canada for failing to arrange public transport to Mt. Edith Cavell, for selling logs cut in a controversial tree-thinning program, for not heeding the Auditor General’s warning about promoting the park for tourism at the expense of ecological integrity, for continuing to charge entry fees to school groups, for not controlling human-use to better protect wildlife habitat in the Three Valley Confluence area surrounding the town of Jasper, for sacrificing habitat to business activities in the Maligne Valley, for failing to get control of mountain-biking and outfitted horse use, for failing to properly protect a caribou herd in imminent danger of extirpation, for letting the operations of outfitters and lodges in the Tonquin Valley continue to do harm, for continuing to use wildlife-attracting sodium chloride as a de-icer on park highways despite the general adoption of non-attracting liquid magnesium chloride in other jurisdictions, for failing to ensure proper enforcement of speed limits in the park’s wildlife-kill zones and for failing to lessen the light pollution at Whistlers tramway terminal, Marmot Basin and the Jasper Park Lodge entry road.

Since our 2002 report we note that Parks Canada has allowed Marmot Basin ski area to open the Outer Limits run into Whistlers Creek, to begin making artificial snow, to investigate summer operation at the area and to continue piecemeal development without providing the agency with a required long-range plan. We are also disappointed that Parks Canada has allowed guided mountain-biking to begin, has supported the Jasper chamber of commerce in a new plan to force all businesses in the park to pay for joint tourism promotion (even going so far as to offer to collect the fees), to use money intended for improving ecological integrity to fund the Jasper Trails Project, which will actually encourage more human use of critical wildlife habitat in the Three Valley Confluence and provide new trails there, to accept Canadian National Railway’s inadequate response to their spilled-grain problem (attracts wildlife to the tracks) or to ensure that the railway reduces wildlife mortality on the eve of what promises to be a large increase in train traffic, or to have a plan in place for the large workforce anticipated as the oil pipeline through the park is doubled.

             

In future, we see a major increase in park visitation from China, India and other Asian countries experiencing economic booms; we think that the agency will be pressured to devolve its business-licensing authority to the Jasper municipal government, and we worry that climate change will have a serious impact on the ecological integrity of the park. Parks Canada seems not to be doing much about these obvious and troubling issues.

To protect Jasper National Park better, we think that Parks Canada should stop helping the tourism industry promote the park, should ensure that speed limits are properly enforced, should switch over from rock salt de-icer to liquid magnesium chloride anti-icer, should prevent passing in wildlife-kill zones, should close the upper Maligne road in winter to protect caribou, should stop selling the trees it is cutting, should re-direct the Jasper Trails Project to prevent further human incursion into the critical wildlife habitat surrounding the town, should get on with designating only certain trails as open to mountain biking and do field enforcement, should end guided mountain-biking before it gets out of control, should clean up the disgraceful horse-and-lodge situation in the Tonquin Valley, should refuse any further development at Marmot Basin ski area (especially in the absence of a long-range plan), should demand that Canadian National Railways quit attracting wildlife to its tracks and offer better protection for park animals generally, should stop charging entry fees to school groups, and should offer more park interpretation.


1. Introduction

The Jasper Environmental Association is a local conservation group that has been actively monitoring the ecological health of Jasper National Park since 1989. The purpose of this report is to briefly present our information and concerns about the park in 2006, updating our “report card” on the park from 2002. This update is timely, because Parks Canada is in the process of evaluating and possibly modifying its management plan. Park officials have been asking for input from interested parties and groups such as ours. The park recently held its Jasper National Park Management Planning Forum, which some of our members attended.


2. Management decisions taken in 2002 that clearly have benefited the park

In 2002 we noted that Parks Canada had made progress in protecting the park by taking the following actions in the five years previous to 2002:

3. Management decisions since 2002 that clearly have benefited the park

We are pleased to note that Parks Canada has made the following improvements in park operations:

4. Issues on which action was required in 2002, but that still exist today

We are not pleased to report that the following problems from 2002 remain unresolved in 2006:

5. New issues


Here are some of the concerns that have arisen since our 2002 report:



6. Issues we see ahead   

 

7. Urgent actions that need to be taken to protect Jasper National Park

The following are well within the capabilities of Parks Canada, and they should be undertaken immediately: