Maligne overnight accommodation issue now before the court

Updated October 29, 2015

Federal court reviews Maligne Lake development proposal

Posted by: Posted date: October 28, 2015 In: Archive, Feature, News | comment :
Mount Charlton, Mount Unwin, Maligne Lake, Jasper National Park, Jasoer Environmental Association, Maligne Tours

Mounts Charlton and Unwin, Maligne Lake


EDMONTON – The fate of Maligne Tours’ development proposal now rests in the hands of a federal court judge who must decide if Parks Canada erred in its decision to approve the company’s plans to build overnight accommodations at the lake.

Ecojustice, on behalf of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) and the Jasper Environmental Association (JEA), filed an application for a judicial review in 2014, alleging that overnight accommodation at the lake would undermine the law and set a dangerous precedent for development in Canada’s national parks.

On Oct. 27, lawyers from Ecojustice and Parks Canada put forward their arguments to Justice James Russell in an Edmonton court room.

Maligne Tours did not represent itself in court, but filed its own submissions to the judge.

The focus of the judicial review was whether Greg Fenton, Jasper’s former superintendent, had the legal authority to approve Maligne Tours’ development proposal for 15 tent cabins.

A large part of the discussion focused on the fact that Fenton’s decision would require an amendment to the park’s management plan in order for the proposal to proceed.

Currently, the management plan prohibits the release of new land for overnight commercial accommodations outside of the Jasper townsite.

In light of the prohibition, Ecojustice asked the judge to quash Fenton’s decision.

“This application is about a decision maker acting outside of his authority and by doing so enabling commercial development within a national park,” said Melissa Gorrie, a lawyer for Ecojustice.

The Ecojustice lawyers argued Fenton didn’t have the legal authority to ask for an amendment and that the park’s management plan is legally binding.

“He is calling for an amendment in response to a development proposal that is completely contrary to the management planning scheme that exists,” argued Gorrie.

“He doesn’t have the authority to be looking at the idea of an amendment at all.”

According to Fraser Thomson, the other lawyer for Ecojustice, the management plan is legally binding and therefore the superintendent must follow it.

“The superintendent made his approval of the cabin proposal contingent on the subsequent amendment of the management plan. That’s an important fact, because nothing is more demonstrative of the fact that the superintendent was bound by the management plan than the fact that he conducted himself as if he was bound by the management plan,” said Thomson.

Fenton was present for the judicial review, but declined to comment.

In July 2014, Fenton rejected Maligne Tours’ proposal to construct a 66-room hotel, but accepted the company’s 13 remaining proposals, including the proposed development of 15 tent cabins at the lake.

Pat Crowley, manager of Maligne Tours, attended the judicial review, but declined to comment.

According to Gorrie, when Maligne Tours put its proposal out for public comment it received almost 2,000 submissions, 99 per cent of which rejected it.

Parks Canada’s lawyers urged the judge to consider the approval of the plan as a “conceptual approval” of the first phase of the development process.

“It is quite clear from the wording that there was no guarantee of any further approval,” said Christine Ashcroft, a lawyer for Parks Canada.

“It was always anticipated that there would be proper submission of a detailed design level proposal and that there would be further review, including a detailed environmental impact review of the proposal.”

She argued that following Ecojustice’s line of thought, Parks Canada would not be able to consider any new ideas or new proposals that are not already contemplated in the park’s management plan.

“This court is actually determining whether Parks Canada can even consider a development proposal contrary to a management plan,” said Ashcroft.

“The applicants view the management plan as legislation, they treat it as regulation. We say that the management plan is a key policy document, but it is not legally binding and it may be changed.”

Ashcroft went on to explain that the Canada National Parks Act includes the ability to make changes to management plans and therefore they are not binding.

She also agreed with the lawyers from Ecojustice that the ecological integrity of Canada’s national parks is Parks Canada’s first priority, but she noted that it isn’t the agency’s only priority.

In her closing arguments, Ashcroft described Fenton’s decision as “completely reasonable” and suggested it showed a balance between ecological integrity and visitor experience.

Alison Ronson, executive director of CPAWS’ northern Alberta chapter, declined to speculate about the court case, but warned that if Ecojustice fails to quash Fenton’s decision it could set a dangerous precedent for other national parks.

“If this decision is allowed to stand it’s a slippery slope that could potentially allow private operators in all national parks across Canada to open management plans and open up policies for personal and private benefits,” said Ronson.

As well as setting a precedent, the JEA is also concerned about the effect tent cabins could have on wildlife in the Maligne Valley, in particular the endangered Maligne caribou herd and the local grizzly population.

“Overnight accommodations at Maligne Lake would bring increased foot and vehicle traffic to the area at night and in the early morning when wildlife is most active,” said Jill Seaton, chair of the JEA, in a press release.

“This presents both ecological and safety concerns because Maligne Lake is within the habitat of an endangered caribou herd and is part of an important grizzly bear corridor.”

Seaton and Ronson were both present for the judicial review.

The judge didn’t provide an indication as to when he would make his decision.

Paul Clarke


Updated October 2, 2015


From  The Pearson Centre

By Nik Lopoukhine

Canada’s system of national parks have been the envy of the world. Beauty, wildness and the diversity of each park set our system of parks apart globally. From its origin of Banff, the national park system stretches from sea to sea to sea with Sable Island to Gwaii Hanaas to Quttinirpaaq on Ellesmere Island.

The protection of these spectacular, diverse and representative areas is in the hands of dedicated professional staff. Their work, protecting these areas for future generations of Canadians, is recognized globally.

Over the years as the system grew, protection became an increasing concern. Internal policies such as eliminating predators and fire suppression, along with burgeoning recreational interests and external pressures from developers were placing our parks at risk. The cumulative effects of poor internal policies and unrelenting pressures for more activities within our national parks became clear. Species were disappearing, ecosystems were degrading and staff was unsure of objectives. Canadians said enough. Support for change in management objectives was overwhelming.

In response, in the 1990s, review Panels were set up. Recommendations were enacted. Legislation was passed and regulations were introduced. Congruent Policies were developed and subsequent Park Management Plans reflected these new directions. In essence, nature protection became the primary priority and clear limitations to development were instituted.

Of note, along with the changes in the governance framework there was a complementary substantive investment in science and monitoring. Parks Canada was poised to become a science based national park system. In June 2000, I was honoured to be appointed as the first science adviser to the Parks Canada Executive Board.

Canada’s National Parks and Parks Canada stood out as models for the rest of the world. Through the course of my eight years, ending in 2012, as the Chair of the World Commission on Protected Areas, I was repeatedly asked for share Canada’s approach to managing its national parks.

Sadly, there is now a regression of our status as global leaders.

Professional staff is threatened by gag orders. Staff firings, without cause, add to the unease. Travel to conferences is limited, locking up Canadian know-how that would otherwise be readily shared with the world. Budget cuts, with science reduced by a third, have placed monitoring and evidence based protection at risk.

With staff silenced, developers have found the door is no longer closed to their outlandish proposals.

Counter to previous agreements, Mount Norquay ski hill operators in Banff National Park now have a summer season in grizzly habitat. The “Glacier Skywalk” in Jasper converted a free lookout to a “pay as you go” large infrastructure that counters standing Park Policy of minimal development. A proposal for a hotel to be built on the shores of Jasper’s Maligne Lake was overturned, but overnight accommodations are still planned despite park policy. Now, in August, Parks Canada approved an expansion of the Lake Louise ski area to in effect double its capacity. What is unprecedented here is this development encroaches into a wilderness area which is prohibited by law from development.

More proposals are under consideration: widening parkways in Banff, expanding Marmot Basin capacity in Jasper and then there is the infamous “Mother Canada” proposal for Cape Breton Highlands National Park.

Insofar as our system of national parks, we are once again at a crossroads. The Oct. 19 election gives Canadians the opportunity to once more to stand up and to say once again, “Enough.” It is critical to restore Parks Canada’s science capacity and to respect the fundamental principal of nature first in all decisions as specified in the laws, regulations and policies affecting our national parks.

The world is watching. Let us not disappoint them and by assuring we have a robust system of national parks that as a first priority protects nature for the enjoyment of future generations of Canadians.

Nikita (Nik) Lopoukhine is the retired director general for National Parks Directorate, Parks Canada, and chair emeritus IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas.

Open Letter from former Parks Canada Scientists and Employees

Updated September 24, 2015

Restoring Science in Canada’s National Parks and National Historic Sites

An Open Letter to the Leaders of the New Democratic Party of Canada, Liberal Party of Canada, and the Green Party of Canada as well as the Media

September 23, 2015

Dear Hon. May, Mulcair, and Trudeau,

As former Parks Canada staff, we are deeply troubled by the seemingly unjustified

and arbitrary firing in mid-June of Dr. John Wilmshurst, who was the Resource

Conservation Manager in Jasper National Park.

Dr. Wilmshurst is a highly respected scientist and well-regarded manager. His career

with Parks Canada spanned just 15 years, yet in this relatively short time, he made

very significant contributions to the advancement of ecological integrity within the

national park system. As a Grasslands Ecologist based out of Winnipeg, he developed

and led an integrated engagement and research project designed to better understand

and communicate native prairie ecosystems. In 2008, he transferred to Jasper National

Park where he assumed responsibilities as Ecosystem Science Leader, then as Caribou

Program Project Manager, and finally as Resource Conservation Manager. All the

while, he also served as an adjunct professor at Laval University and University of


In recognition of his outstanding work, the Agency bestowed on him its most

prestigious honour, the CEO Award of Excellence, in 2009 for his contribution to the

development of principles and guidelines for ecological protection in Canada’s

national parks. More recently, in 2012, he was given the Public Service Award for

conceiving and leading a restoration and monitoring program for Grasslands National


The reason for Dr. Wilmshurst’s firing is unknown but it appears consistent with the

purging of science-based management taking place in the national parks of Canada.

Like a spectre, the threat of these seemingly arbitrary firings has haunted not just the

corridors of Parks Canada but also those of other federal departments. As those who

dare to speak up on issues related to the ecological integrity of the national parks or

the commemorative integrity of the national historic sites are removed from their

positions, a deep fear is instilled to ensure that those remaining toe the party line.

Canadians are proud of their national parks and national historic sites. They have

entrusted them to successive governments to care for as irreplaceable legacies and to

ensure that these special places are passed along to future generations in as good, if

not better, condition then when received. They understand that maintaining ecological

or commemorative integrity can only be achieved with science and that this science

must be integrated into park and site management decision-making. They also

rightfully expect that science to be communicated back to them. A government that

blocks, twists, or diverts this communication commits an undemocratic act by

denying their citizens the knowledge to make informed decisions.

Therefore, we are asking you to state publicly commitments you are prepared to make

to protect and restore the ecological and commemorative integrity of our national

parks and historic sites if you and your party form the next government. In particular,

what are you prepared to do to restore science capacity to Parks Canada and other

federal departments so they can carry out and communicate social, ecological and

traditional ecological knowledge? Would you undertake an investigation into what

appear to be politically motivated dismissals of scientists and managers within the

Agency under the Harper government and, where appropriate, offer amnesty or an

apology to the affected individuals?

Additionally, we urge all Canadians to ask these questions of the candidates in their

riding and then to seriously consider these matters when they vote on Oct. 19.


The letter is signed by 120 former Parks Canada staff employees including;

Bruce Amos, Director-General, National Parks Directorate,

Nik Lopoukhine, Director General of National Parks

Michael Porter, Director General, National Parks Directorate;

Pat Thomson, Director-General, National Parks Directorate;

Stephen Woodley, Chief Scientist, Ottawa;


Parks Canada Scientists

Updated September 23, 2015

John Wilmshurst, a resource conservation manager with Parks Canada, speaks in May 2014 about the receding glaciers of the Columbia Icefields in Jasper National Park. JEFF MCINTOSH / THE CANADIAN PRESS

Pressure rising against the firing of Parks Canada scientists

In an unprecedented open letter, more than 100 former Parks Canada employees and scientists are protesting the firing of a respected Jasper Park scientist and the “deep fear instilled” among those who remain.

The group is also protesting recent development decisions, including the expansion of Lake Louise ski resort, saying they erode parks policies that demand ecological integrity be protected based on a scientific approach.

Jasper Park manager John Wilmshurst was fired in mid June. No reasons were given and the veteran Parks Canada scientist has not spoken publicly.

“The reason for Dr. Wilmshurst’s firing is unknown,” the letter says. “But it appears consistent with the purging of science-based management taking place in the national parks of Canada.”

A decision last month announcing the Lake Louise development didn’t reflect the scientific evidence presented about the proposal, said Nik Lopoukhine, retired director general for National Parks Directorate, Parks Canada.

“The issue here is the broader question of scientific staff told not to speak, and environmental policies being eroded,” he said in an interview Wednesday morning.

“The final straw was the August announcement on Lake Louise expansion — we decided we need to step and say something.”

The letter asks the Liberals, New Democrats and Green parties to outline what commitments they are prepared to make “to protect and restore” the ecological integrity of the parks.

“As those who dare to speak up on issues related to the ecological integrity of the national parks or the commemorative integrity of the national historic sites, are removed from their positions, a deep fear is instilled to ensure that those remaining toe the party line,” says the letter.

Fight For Your Parks

Updated September 17, 2015

New alliance formed

Canada National Parks, First Nations, Kinbasket Shuswap, Fight For Your Parks

Members of the Kinbasket Shuswap First Nations with four members of the conservation coalition.

Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Association, Wildsight and Wild Canada Conservation Alliance have come together to fight against further inappropriate commercial developments in Canada’s national parks.

Press Release

Broad-based group of Canadians demands a stop to commercialization of Canada’s national parks.

Banff, AB. – September 16, 2015 Today a diverse group of Canadians with a deep concern for the well-being of our national parks gathered in Banff to call for an end to inappropriate commercialization of Canada’s national parks.

Recent commercial projects in Banff and Jasper National Parks have privatized public spaces and threatened the very framework that controls development in our parks.

The Glacier Skywalk and the proposed new accommodation at Maligne Lake in Jasper National Park both convert public space for private gain. The approval of the massive expansion of the Lake Louise ski hill involves releasing new land, which is currently designated as protected wilderness, for commercial development in a much-loved backcountry area.

Canada’s national parks belong to all Canadians. It’s up to all of us to protect the natural values our parks are intended to protect, and to pass them on unimpaired to future generations.

“My family has been involved with Banff National Park throughout the park’s entire history,” said Harvey Locke, a Banff resident and globally recognized authority on national parks. “In 1996 I was appointed by the Minister of Canadian Heritage to advise on the Banff National Park Management Plan that set a balanced framework in place to protect the park and provide a first-class experience for visitors. I am appalled that a recent surge in commercial development approvals threatens the rules that keep development under control and protect nature in this UNESCO World Heritage Site.”

“When I was superintendent of Banff National Park, we consulted Canadians in preparation for the 2010 management plan,“ said Kevin Van Tighem, a career Parks Canada employee who retired as Superintendent of Banff National Park in 2011. “Over 1000 Canadians participated; none of them called for more commercial development and a lot of them expressed concern about there being too much.”

“We Shuswap (Secwepemc First Nation) people have a long history with these lands now in National Parks,” said Audrey Eugene, Culture & History Liaison for the Kinbasket Shuswap Band. “They need to be managed for nature. Privatizing them for commercial gain is wrong. We feel so strongly about this that our Secwepemc First Nation Elders have passed a statement against privatization of our national parks.”

“As a business owner with a significant investment in both the town of Banff and in an outlying area of the Park, I count on there being a predictable regulatory framework that is fair and protects the Park because the National Park is the essence of my business,” said Peter Poole, principal of Arctos & Bird, Bison Courtyard and Juniper Hotel. “When longstanding policies are waived to

favour one private business over another, it is not only unfair, it is harmful to the rest of us and hurts Banff’s brand.”

Rallying under the banner of FightForYourParks is a wide range of individuals, business owners, environmental organizations such as the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS), Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y), Alberta Wilderness Association, Wildsight, Jasper Environmental Association, Wild Canada Conservation Alliance, scientists, First Nations, and former Parks Canada staff.

Fight For Your Parks intends to shine a spotlight on this serious risk to our national parks during the federal election. Together we will engage Canadians from coast to coast to coast and will work for these specific outcomes:

1. A reversal of the last-minute approval of Lake Louise Ski Resort’s massive expansion;

2. A return to the longstanding policy that no new lands will be released for commercial development in our national parks;

3. A return to honouring the National Parks Act’s emphasis on putting nature (ecological integrity) first in all our national parks; and

4. A commitment that legally protected wilderness in our national parks will stay that way forever.

National Parks are a public good. They belong to all Canadians. Fight For Your Parks insists that the dedication clause of our National Parks Act be honoured in spirit and in law by Parks Canada.

“The national parks of Canada are hereby dedicated to the people of Canada for their benefit, education and enjoyment, subject to this Act and the regulations, and the parks shall be maintained and made use of so as to leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.– Canada’s National Parks Act

“Every 20 years there is a frontal assault on the frameworks that control development in our national parks by those who seek to exploit them for private gain,” said Harvey Locke. “Now in 2015 it is our turn to stand up and Fight For Your Parks. We invite everyone to join us.”


Media Contact

Blair Cosgrove 403-889-4293 @Blaircosgrove

Marmot expansion may occur despite threat to caribou

Updated August 7, 2015

  • Parks Canada is not closing the door on more development and expansion at Jasper National Park’s Marmot ski hill, even though a commissioned study concludes expansion will harm endangered caribou.

From : Rocky Mountain Outlook August 5, 2015

Parks Canada is not closing the door on more development and expansion at Jasper National Park’s Marmot ski hill, even though a commissioned study concludes expansion will harm endangered caribou.

At the same time, the federal agency continues to explore the feasibility of reintroducing caribou into Banff National Park, where a remnant herd was wiped out in an avalanche in 2009, and to augment dwindling herds in Jasper through a captive breeding program.

Scientists are worried Parks Canada is giving in to commercial interests over protecting an endangered caribou herd, in particular the Tonquin herd, whose northeastern potion of its range takes in Marmot Basin ski area.

Mark Hebblewhite, a renowned caribou expert who has studied caribou in both Banff and Jasper, said it’s unethical to think about reintroducing caribou into Banff and Jasper, while at the same time considering development that would harm the struggling Tonquin herd.

“Taking caribou from somewhere else to fill in holes in the dike, while at the same time thinking about more commercial development, is unethical and irresponsible,” said Hebblewhite, an associate professor in the University of Montana’s wildlife biology program.

“Any expansion is basically going to destroy critical habitat during winter for a federally endangered species. Parks Canada’s own risk assessment shows there’s no way you can expand the ski resort without further harm to the caribou.”

Parks Canada commissioned the third party assessment to help them determine whether or not to consider, in a future long-range plan, proposals to develop ski lift access in the Outer Limits and Tres Hombres areas.

The caribou risk assessment is also meant to inform decisions for managing off-piste skiing and other human uses in the Whistlers Creek drainage.

Led by Fiona Schmiegelow, one of the country’s leading caribou researchers, the independent study looked at the effects development and expansion of the ski hill would have on caribou. It was completed more than a year ago, but was never made public by Parks Canada.

Schmiegelow decided to go public with the assessment after John Wilmshurst, who commissioned the report, was abruptly fired as Jasper National Park’s resource conservation manager in June.

Her risk assessment found there is considerable evidence to categorize the Tonquin caribou herd as not self-sustaining. The current numbers in the herd are estimated to be about 38 individuals – and that’s the largest herd in south Jasper.

Schmiegelow, a University of Alberta biology professor, said the recovery strategy for southern mountain caribou identifies all areas of high elevation winter and or summer range as critical habitat, which would include Marmot Basin ski area.

Roads and trails and snow compaction already give wolves far easier access into caribou habitat, and developing additional areas for human activity will only make matters worse for caribou, she said.

“New developments within the Tonquin range could exacerbate current conditions, and therefore would not be consistent with the need for active recovery efforts to address threats to the rapidly declining Tonquin caribou population,” said Schmiegelow.

The assessment concluded new ski area development in the Tres Hombres and Outer Limits areas could significantly increase the number of people in the Whistlers Creek area, and that Tonquin caribou winter habitat selection, predominantly during late winter, has already been reduced within a buffer of approximately five kilometres of the presently developed area.

“This avoidance is not explained by predation risk, suggesting that late winter avoidance of Marmot Basin is a result of human activities,” said Schmiegelow.

“New developments are not consistent with population recovery objectives, and mitigating options for existing developments should be implemented.”

In June, the federal government approved a long-range plan for Marmot Basin that allows expanded snowmaking, additional parking and transportation access, upgrades to the Caribou Chalet and some tree thinning for glade skiing.

But any proposed developments for Tres Hombres and Outer Limits, which the ski hill indicated it would advance in a future additional long-range plan, were waiting on the results of the independent caribou risk assessment.

Greg Fenton, superintendent of Jasper National Park, said Parks Canada has still made no decisions on ski hill development for Tres Hombres and Outer Limits, and likely won’t until fall.

“We are still reviewing the report,” he said. “There has been some preliminary analysis by my staff and when there are final recommendations to me, I will have a discussion with Marmot Basin about those recommendations and then I will make a decision.”

Fenton said Parks Canada still plans on moving ahead with a captive breeding program as part of its caribou conservation plan. Earlier this year, the Calgary Zoo pulled out of a partnership, which they cited was due to lack of funding from Parks.

The cost to construct a captive breeding facility is estimated between $2 million and $3 million, with operating costs between $300,000 and $500,000 per year. There are now considerations to include a visitor centre as part of the program.

Fenton said the B.C. government has conceptually agreed to provide caribou for the breeding program from some its herds, but Parks Canada is still looking for a location for the breeding facility.

“The animals would be raised to augment existing herds in Jasper, focusing on the Maligne, Tonquin and Brazeau,” said Fenton. “And we’ve always said the vision and goal is also herd reintroduction in Banff in the north end.”

Jasper National Park has four main herds. The northern A la Peche herd, estimated at less than 100 caribou, spends most of its time outside the national park. In recent years, surveys suggest the A la Peche population has declined.

Three additional herds of caribou are found in the southern part of Jasper National Park, spending most, if not all, their time within the national park. The three herds use distinct regions of the park and rarely interact.

In total, their numbers are estimated at approximately 55 animals and have been declining. The largest herd in south Jasper is the Tonquin herd with 38. The other two herds, Maligne and Brazeau, both have less than 10 animals.

Schmiegelow’s report concluded when caribou on provincial lands in Alberta and B.C. are at risk from industrial development – given wolves have greater access into traditional caribou range with roads and seismic lines – national park herds are more important than ever.

“Recovery actions for caribou populations with ranges within national park boundaries are urgent and can inform and potentially influence the outcome of management decisions for surrounding populations,” she said.

Hebblewhite said Parks Canada should do everything possible to save the Tonquin herd, noting the risk assessment should be the centrepiece of Parks Canada’s decision-making, not business interests.

“It’s the biggest herd solely within the national park system,” he said. “The Maligne and Brazeau herds are basically the walking dead.”

Hebblewhite said he believes any future expansion at Marmot Basin would be contestable in court under the Species At Risk Act (SARA).

“It would be very difficult for a federal government to fight for development in critical habitat. I think it would be suicidal,” he said.

Hebblewhite said the Lake Louise ski hill – which is proposing massive growth and expansion and has had its site guidelines to guide future development approved – also falls within caribou range.

“I don’t see logically why it’s not critical habitat. People may say that’s because there’s no caribou, but there has been no official decision that wrote off caribou in Banff National Park as extirpated,” he said.

Article by Cathy Ellis

Rocky Mountain Outlook

Tonquin Caribou Risk Assessment

Updated July 25, 2015


Parks Canada had refused any development by Marmot Basin into the wilderness area of its lease in the Whistlers Creek Valley since 1981 because of possible adverse effects on woodland caribou and mountain goats. However, in 2008 it decided to consider development expansion into the valley depending on the results of an independent two-year caribou study. The study was completed in March 2014 and the JEA understood it would be available to the public last fall but all requests to obtain it since then were refused.

The Report on the Tonquin Caribou Risk Assessment was finally released this week – but not by Parks Canada. It was released by Dr. Fiona Schmiegelow, the report’s lead author, citing the abrupt firing last month of Dr. John Wilmshurst, Jasper’s Resource Conservation Manager, as the catalyst for her decision to make the report public.

The 62-page report and its 97-page appendix show only too clearly the importance of Whistlers Creek Valley to the caribou, the dire straits the Tonquin caribou herd is in and steps that should be taken to avoid disturbance of this endangered population that has dropped from approximately 111 in 2006 to 54 in 2011.

Download the pdf Report on the Tonquin Caribou Risk Assessment

A man of science, a source of inspiration

Updated July 7, 2015

From The Jasper Local by Bob Covey


Fired from Parks Canada

Dr. John Wilmshurst

Deep inside the JNP warden compound, through the entrance to the Resource Conservation wing and past a series of cubicles, on June 19, an office door was left ajar.

Taped to the office door were dozens of messages of support for a man who was no longer allowed to go through it. Dr. John Wilmshurst was fired from his post as Resource Conservation officer on June 11.

Neither Parks Canada officials nor Wilmshurst would provide a statement about the firing, but the messages, as well as a photo of a smiling Wilmshurst which was also covered in well wishes, said a lot.

“Best manager I’ve had in 33 years,” one note read.

“A source of inspiration,” said another. “Still our Chief.”

“Forever our leader.”

After a seven year stint as a grasslands ecologist in Winnipeg, where he performed work which won him a CEO Award of Excellence from Parks Canada, Wilmshurst came to Jasper in 2008 as JNP’s Science Coordinator. He occupied that post for four years before transitioning to the role of caribou program project manager—a project which spanned all of Canada’s mountain parks. When former Jasper Resource Conservation Manager Steve Otway retired in 2012, Wilmshurst was hired for the job, heading up approximately 50 employees working in Jasper.

Since becoming a biologist for the national parks, Wilmshurst’s speciality had shifted from behavioural ecology to conservation biology tending towards wildlife management. His teams’ work have been guided by a seminal Parks Canada report in 2000 which helped usher in an era of using ecological integrity as a measurable management tool. The report’s authors were part of a Panel of Ecological Integrity, a committee created in 1998 after the Liberal government promised to do a better job of protecting Canada’s natural heritage.

“In Canadian national parks, ecological integrity has evolved from a scientific idea into a management system. It connects science to management,” Dr. Stephen Woodley, who was on that panel Panel on Ecological Integrity, wrote in 2010.

Critics of the current government point out its unwillingness to take meaningful steps to address climate change, despite scientific evidence calling for stricter emissions targets, for example. Meanwhile, Wilmshurst has been featured in the national media speaking to the potentially catastrophic effects of not adapting to curtail climate change. In a 2014 story produced by the Canadian Press and picked up by the CBC, Huffington Post, McLean’s and other major news outlets, Wilmshurst described research he and his colleagues were doing on the melting Athabasca Glacier. He predicted that the ice could be gone in his children’s lifetime, a statement supported by recently-published research out of the University of British Columbia.

“The information that we’re getting is pretty clear that climate is warming,” he told the camera. (Climate change) is definitely something that is happening and it’s happening because of our activities.”

Wilmshurst was a well-regarded boss, as evidenced by the messages which adorned his former office door, Words such as “inspirational” and “dedicated;” “integrity” and “kindness;” and “defending” and “standing up” were peppered throughout the thank-you notes.

Those last two verbs, at least according to theories some Jasperites are putting forward, could be telling as to Wilmshurst’s dismissal. The Jasper Environmental Association presumes that Wilmshurst was fired because he chose to carry out his job according to his high principles.

“The faceless individual who took this step is part of a bureaucracy that has become so poisoned with suspicion and intolerance that anyone who does their job according to what they believe is best for a national park is now in danger of facing this kind of draconian measure,” JEA Chair, Jill Seaton, has said.

The Jasper Local has learned that JNP’s Integrated Land Use Planner, Sean Cardiff, will act in the Resource Conservation Manager position in the interim.

Bob Covey  – The Jasper Local








Jasper’s top conservation manager fired

Updated July 5, 2015


From the Rocky Mountain Outlook July 2, 2015

Jasper National Park’s resource conservation manager has been fired, raising questions among conservationists and scientists about why and whether it is part of a larger pattern of dismantling the scientific capacity at the federal agency.

Multiple sources have confirmed John Wilmshurst was given his walking papers on June 11. He was second in command in Jasper, behind superintendent Greg Fenton, where he has been resource conservation manager since October 2012.

Wilmshurst declined to comment and has hired a lawyer.

The reasons for the sudden departure of Wilmshurst, who is a staunch defender of science and passionate about wildlife conservation and habitat protection according to colleagues, remain a mystery.

Parks Canada is not commenting.“This is a human resources matter and Parks Canada does not comment on issues of this nature,” said Parks Canada spokesperson Kavitha Palanisamy.

Stephen Woodley, who retired as Parks Canada’s chief scientist three years ago after a 34-year career with the federal agency, said Wilmshurst is an excellent scientist.

“I worked with him for many years and he’s an outstanding scientist and this is a huge loss to Parks Canada,” said Woodley, who now works with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

“I’m a bit astonished. He gave fearless advice and loyal implementation, which is the hallmarks of a good civil servant,” he added.

“He was very objective. All good scientists are highly skeptical of information that comes before them and he was willing to ask the tough questions.”

As resource conservation manager, Wilmshurst led a team of 35 people working in wildlife biology, ecological research and monitoring, aquatic ecology, fire and vegetation management, public safety, search and rescue and emergency dispatch.

Wilmshurst was Parks Canada’s project manager for the protection and recovery of endangered woodland caribou populations from January 2011 to October 2012.

Jasper’s southern mountain caribou population totals approximately 150, and all herds are struggling. He led meetings in Edmonton and Jasper when delayed recreational access to caribou winter habitat in Jasper was announced.

In addition, Wilmshurst has also been involved with work surrounding ongoing protection of harlequin ducks on the Maligne River. The mid-Maligne river has been closed by Parks Canada to commercial rafting since 1999.

Wilmshurst was also the ecosystem science coordinator in Jasper during the development of Brewster’s Skywalk and he and his scientific staff participated in environmental assessments and research and monitoring associated with the project proposal.

Around the same time, he was also co-supervising a goat study from the University of Laval on goats at Marmot Basin ski area with renowned goat expert Steeve Cote, to try to understand the potential effects of ski area development on goat populations.

Conservation groups, including the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS), Jasper Environmental Association and Bow Valley Naturalists, have long expressed concern that the science capacity of Parks Canada is being dismantled.

“The federal government hand in hand with powerful business interests has brutally crippled a once proud department,” said Jill Seaton, chair of Jasper Environmental Association in an emailed statement.

In the past several years, scientists from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Parks Canada and Environment Canada have either been dismissed or left the government service, and programs and research facilities have lost their funding.

“I speak to many colleagues inside the organization and there is a significant chill about providing strong advice on conservation,” Woodley said.

Wilmshurst was given Parks Canada’s CEO Award of Excellence in 2009, as a member of a team who worked on principles and guidelines for ecological protection in Canada’s protected natural areas.

He was also given Public Service Award in 2012 in recognition for his scientific contribution as a member who conceived and implement a restoration and monitoring program for Grasslands National Park.

Cathy Ellis

Rocky Mountain Outlook




Letters regarding the dismissal of Dr. John Wilmshurst

Updated July 4, 2015

It’s all about money in our parks

Posted from The Jasper Local  July 1, 2015

Does Parks Canada recognize the path they are going down?

It is with deep sadness that I learned of the recent dismissal of Dr. John Wilmshurst as the head of Resource Conservation in JNP. John was dismissed last week “without cause,” which in government “new speak” means that he was not dancing to the tune that the current administration is playing on the jukebox.

In recent years Parks management have shifted their priorities from ecological integrity to enhancing attractions and developing visitor experiences in the Parks. This shift is thought to make national parks more relevant to Canadians and provide attractions which will bring more visitors and their money to the parks. It’s all about money!

In this shift they have fallen into the trap of dreaming up an ever increasing stream of   new ideas to attract more visitors without considering if these activities are even appropriate to the parks or what the impacts on the park, animals and environment might be.

The Harper government and Parks Canada have been putting science under the microscope for years now and only support science when it supports the current political agenda. Often staff members who dare to speak up are muzzled or sidelined by management.

John Wilmshurst is one of these people. He is a scientist and a man of integrity, principles and values. He stood strongly for the environment and national parks and felt that he had a moral and ethical duty to speak up.

He paid the price for this integrity.

Stand tall John and be proud, we are with you.

Sincerely yours, Terry Winkler (Parks Canada employee until 2012)


Connecting observations

Posted by:  Posted date: June 24, 2015 In: ArchiveLetters To The Editor |

Dear Editor,

My heart sank into deep sadness when I learned that Dr. John Wilmshurst had been fired as the Head of Resource Conservation in Jasper National Park.

I feel the pain and tough implications this has for the family as much as it has for this National Park and our community.

John is a highly skilled, smart man with high values and standards for ecological and personal integrity, people skills that allowed him to rebuild a team out of a group of employees that were left shaken and demoralized after the dubious staff cuts of 2012 and he understands the essence and fibre needed to create community fabric.

These elements put together grow resilience—something either Parks Canada or this current government don’t seem to value, because people displaying qualities such as John displayed can’t be manipulated or “bought” easily, so “best” to cut them out; this way the rest of the organization will go back without question to the new agenda of “attracting more money” rather than being prudent about protecting this National Park and our community for those who come after our time.

Who do we have left as genuine mentors for the greater good of wholeness in this National Park?

When will we stand together? What has to happen for us to stand for each other, rather than our own personal agenda? What has to die for us to move from “me” to “we”?

The divide and conquer method currently being applied will kill us all one by one and it will not stop within the organization of Parks Canada, it will affect Jasper and our country in its entirety.

I know most don’t want to hear this.

Can we finally learn from the animals in this Park? It seems to me the elk stand together.

Can we make the connection from wolf predation/caribou to visitor experience—big business/integrity?

Can we make the connection from cougar mother/juvenile cat (and it’s death) to mentor/young inexperienced or silenced staff?

I could come up with more of those. All along our wildlife has been trying to teach us about how we humans are connected to the wildness of life and instead we “manage” in strange ways, and those like John who are awake get “cut out” so not to disrupt the slumber and comfort of others—sad—or we could choose to wake up.

John, our heart is with you and your family. Stand proud and tall, you have every reason for it.

Ursula Winkler
Jasper, Alta.

Fired for what reason?

Posted by:  Posted date: June 17, 2015 In: ArchiveLetters To The Editor | comment : 0

Dear Editor,

Jasper National Park’s Manager of Resource Conservation has been fired for no stated reason but anyone who knows Dr. Wilmshurst is well aware of the great love and deep concern that he has for this park. So we may presume that he was fired because he chose to carry out his job according to his high principles, extensive knowledge and considerable experience to fulfill Parks Canada’s mandate to protect Jasper National Park for future generations.

Whether this demonstrably underhanded order ultimately came from the federal government or senior Parks Canada staff in Ottawa is irrelevant. The faceless individual who took this step is part of a bureaucracy that has become so poisoned with suspicion and intolerance that anyone who does their job according to what they believe is best for a national park is now in danger of facing this kind of draconian measure.

There is honour in Dr. Wilmshurst being fired for following the high standards of protection for Canada’s revered national parks. Nothing but dishonour can be ascribed to those who see fit to getting him out of the way so they can follow the government agenda without question or conscience.

The federal government hand in hand with powerful business interests has brutally crippled a once-proud department. Thousands of staff have either lost their jobs or voluntarily left the now noxious atmosphere of these magnificent areas protected over a century ago by a far-sighted government to become an integral part of Canada’s heritage and psyche.

If we are not to lose these areas altogether to commercialization we need to ensure that highly principled staff like Dr. Wilmshurst are permitted to voice their concerns so Parks Canada may begin to return to its mandate to protect these wild places and their wildlife for future generations of Canadians and visitors from around the world.

Jill Seaton (Chair)
Jasper Environmental Association

There’s good reason to worry

Posted by:  Posted date: June 17, 2015 In: ArchiveLetters To The Editor | comment : 0

Dear Editor,

Another cold, grey pallor has settled down on the town of Jasper, another unsettling and unnerving quiet smothers the June streets. We all feel the icy cold stabs of disbelief, shock and outrage as it whips through the town, with a bite more vicious than a December north wind—the unprecedented dismissal of JNP employee John Wilmshurst has stunned the JNP family and the community of Jasper.

I grew up in JNP and in a Park Warden family; until this date, there has never been such a perplexing and gut wrenching act, as the recent dismissal of John Wilmshurst, a good and honourable man, who for five years was the science coordinator for the Mountain Parks, and recently (in old time Warden lingo), the Chief Park Warden of JNP.

The big question is WHY? But here’s where things get confusing; severely vexing with shades of questionable political grey. Many of us are concerned about the way things are now being conducted, with regards to managing our national parks. How can a man as highly regarded and respected as John be treated in such a disrespectful fashion? What could he have done to warrant this dismissal? Some speculate he was a marked man. Could he have challenged the dogma of a paranoid and protective government?

Many of us are aware that PC staff are ordered “not to talk”, trained PC media personnel spin a coloured yarn with efficient brain washing, interwoven with layers of secrecy that seem to be insidiously attached to managing our national parks.

John Wilmshurst is a decent man that shrink wraps integrity and honesty around his thin frame. During the PC open house in 2013, over 200 winter users of JNP, packed toques and merino wool into the basement of the Crimson Hotel. The heated topic was caribou conservation and why PC was closing a vast majority of JNP to winter users. He stood up, with hundreds of upset eyes boring into him; he explained and defended PC’s position with humour and conviction. I could see the inner frustration build, as John, the scientist tried to explain the complexities concerning the importance of caribou conservation. He passionately said, “I’m not going to give up on a single animal.”

I’ve worked on many trail related matters with John; he was on one side of the table, in a PC uniform, and I on the other side, trying to defend and promote trail use. These sides often clash; it takes effort and perseverance to understand each other, but at the end of the day, we remained friends and shared many trail and street side laughs. I will really miss John.

What were the real reasons behind the dismissal of John Wilmshurst? If he was terminated for political reasons, the words of Shakespeare come to mind, “There is something rotten in the state of Denmark” and there is good reason to be worried.

Loni Klettl
Jasper, Alta.